Showing posts with label Gulf War Veterans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gulf War Veterans. Show all posts

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Gulf War Vet and wife's death may have been murder-suicide

UPDATE

AH Shooting Ruled Murder-Suicide; Two Had DP Ties
Posted: Saturday, January 28, 2012 11:54 am
By TOM ROBB Journal and Topics Reporter
Members of Des Plaines veterans organizations remembered two colleagues this week found dead in what the Cook County Medical Examiner Thursday ruled a murder-suicide.

Police said Roger and Angelita James, 48 and 56 respectively, of the 900 block of Shady Way, Arlington Hts., both sustained gunshot wounds Wednesday. A gun was found "in close proximity to the body" at the crime scene, said Arlington Hts. Police Capt. Ken Galinski.

Mr. James was commander of Des Plaines American Legion Post 36 and a member of Des Plaines VFW Post 2992. Mrs. James was a member of the American Legion Women's Auxiliary.

Arlington Hts. police conducting a welfare check with the couple's adult son found the couple dead in their home across from Forest View Educational Center Wednesday morning.
read more here
Arlington Heights couple found shot to death in home

By Matt Arado and Madhu Krishnamurthy
1/25/2012

Arlington Heights police are investigating the deaths of a husband and wife found shot to death in their home Wednesday morning.

Police discovered the bodies of Angelita James, 56, and Roger D. James, 48, about 8:40 a.m. after forcing their way into the residence on East Shady Way when no one responded to the door.

Police Sgt. Richard Kappelman said evidence collected so far was “pointing” to the shootings being a murder-suicide.

Angelita James' son met police at the residence, telling officers his mother had not shown up for work for the past two days and couldn't be reached. The vehicles of both Angelita and Roger James were parked outside the home, police said.

Inside, police found the couple in a bedroom, dead from gunshot wounds. A firearm was found inside the home, but police declined to say whether they believe it was the weapon used in the shootings.

Police said they believe the tragedy was domestic and there is no danger to the community. Autopsies are scheduled for Thursday at the Cook County medical examiner's office.

Roger James was a veteran of the Gulf War and commander of the Des Plaines American Legion Post 36, said his friend and past commander Phil Campbell. He was last seen at the Legion office on Monday.
read more here

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Gulf War Veteran searches for her missing service dog

Veteran searches for missing service dog


Updated: Jan 07, 2012 7:01 AM EST

Veteran Karren Coober is searching for her lost service dog, Tia. (Source: WTVR/CNN)
PRINCE EDWARD COUNTY, VA (WTVR/CNN) – A war veteran who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder is on a desperate mission to find her missing service dog.

Karren Coober, a desert storm veteran, has been in the woods everyday this week looking for her lost dog, Tia. Coober says she cannot live without Tia and is desperate to find her.

"Since she's gone I haven't been anywhere, she was my lifeline to the outside world," Coober said.
read more here

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Gulf War Veterans Ditched Again

Veterans worry about Gulf War illness funding
By Kelly Kennedy - USA Today
Posted : Wednesday Oct 12, 2011 20:03:52 EDT
A congressional move to shift control of the flow of money to research a mysterious Gulf War illness has alarmed veterans of that conflict who fear the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments have little interest in uncovering the true causes of their ailments.

“In its short history, the program has funded more trials of promising treatments than all other government programs combined in the 20 years since these troops came home sick,” said Jim Binns, chairman of the Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses. “It is by far the best hope to improve their health and to prevent similar illnesses in current and future conflicts.”

In the past, Binns said, VA research focused on the mental health issues of veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, while the Defense Department stopped funding research on Gulf War illness several years ago. Now, the Defense Department’s Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) exists only because Congress designates money to the Defense Department budget each year to study Gulf War illness.

But on Sept. 15, the Senate voted to exclude the program from next year’s Defense Appropriations Act, while the House, after a last-ditch amendment from Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, voted to fund it with $10 million.
read more here

Monday, September 19, 2011

Study links Gulf War illnesses to location

Study links Gulf War illnesses to location
By Kelly Kennedy - USA TODAY
Posted : Monday Sep 19, 2011 7:20:53 EDT
WASHINGTON — New research to be released Monday shows that veterans with Gulf War illness faced different toxins depending on where they were served: anti-nerve-agent pills and Scud missiles for forward-deployed troops and pesticides for support personnel in the rear.

There’s also no correlation between anthrax shots, depleted uranium and psychological issues and Gulf War illness, said the study by the Midwest Research Institute to appear in the Environmental Health Perspectives journal. That supports earlier research on those topics.

“Already, the evidence was mounting for these two exposures,” said Lea Steele, lead author and director of Baylor University’s Research Initiative on Complex Illness. “When you pull all the research together, you start to see patterns that are very consistent.”

About one-fourth of the 700,000 veterans who served in the 1991 Persian Gulf War developed symptoms that include chronic headaches, widespread pain, memory and concentration problems, persistent fatigue, gastrointestinal problems, skin abnormalities and mood disturbances.”
read more here

Saturday, August 20, 2011

US Marines have a new 2nd LT

US Marines have a new 2nd LT.

Eric Schwinghammer was just commissioned at the Vietnam Veterans War Museum in Orlando FL. His older brother Jacob did the honors and their Dad, David, helped make this more touching when he gave his son the challenge coin he had since the Gulf War. David is a Gulf War Veteran.

Thursday, July 28, 2011

Veteran's Suicide through Explosion Threat Sparks Duluth Stand-Off

Veteran's Suicide through Explosion Threat Sparks Duluth Stand-Off
Wed, 07/27/2011 -

By Jacob Kittilstad and photojournalist Jeff Ernewein, FOX 21 News

DULUTH-A police perimeter shuts down a West Duluth neighborhood after a Persian Gulf veteran threatens to kill himself. His planned suicide method was explosion.

A “flash-bang” fires, a military man falls: 32-year-old Miles Froberg's suicide standoff ends with an explosion but not the one he may have planned.

"I called around,” neighbor Brett Hiemenz said, “And [I] figured out what was happening. He was planning on blowing himself up in the house."

Neighbors say they saw their streets become a warzone at 9 a.m. Wednesday morning as the Persian Gulf veteran holed up with rumored weapons at his 3400 block, West 5th Street address.

for video report and more, go here
Veteran's Suicide through Explosion Threat

Friday, July 9, 2010

Call Congress Today - Our Veterans Need Treatment

You've read the reports on burn pits on this blog since they were first reported. You know how serious this is. You've read about Gulf War veterans suffering and waiting for help. If you didn't care about these issues, didn't care about our veterans, you wouldn't be reading this blog. Since you care so much, please do what you can to help by making the calls to help our veterans.

Call Congress Today - Our Veterans Need Treatment !

Issue: Call Congress and voice your support for full funding for the Gulf War illness research program of the Department of Defense. The military program is called the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program, or CDMRP. Veterans for Common Sense urges funding at the full $25 million level.

Background: Earlier this year, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recognized the chronic multisymptom illness suffered by 250,000 Gulf War veterans due are to toxic exposures during Desert Shield and Desert Storm. The Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illness (RAC) reached the same scientific conclusion in 2008. The IOM and RAC support research programs to develop treatments and hopefully preventions for both our veterans and our troops deployed overseas now.

Why is this important? Many of these toxic exposures exist today. By calling both the Washington and local offices of the senior Democratic and Republican members of the Appropriations Subcommittee deciding CPMR funding, you let them know that this illness is a huge problem suffered by real people who served our country.

You've heard of the Iraq War Burn Pits? We can't let another generation of veterans wait a decade for medical care. Tell Congress to do the right thing for our veterans so we can have medical treatments for toxic exposures.

Who do I call? Please call two important Congressmen who will decide if Gulf War, Afghanistan War, and Iraq War veterans get the research and treatment they urgently need.

1. Chairman Norm Dicks, Washington, DC 202-225-5916; Tacoma, WA 253-593-6536.

2. Congressman Bill Young, ranking member, Washington 202-225-5961; St. Petersburg, FL 727-893-3191.

Thank you for calling today !

Veterans For Common Sense

Thursday, June 10, 2010

PTSD on Trial: Gulf War decorated veteran 15 years for assaulting a cop

Decorated vet gets 15 years for assaulting cop with car
By JOHN MOLSEED
WATERLOO - A Waterloo man was sentenced to 15 years in prison for driving his car at a Waterloo police officer.

Deon Lemar Mosley, 38, was sentenced Wednesday on a charge of assault on a peace officer. He was ordered to serve the sentence concurrent with a fifteen-year sentence on second-degree theft and a five-year sentence for eluding.

Mosley plead guilty Feb. 25 to the assault charge for driving his car at officer Kevin Boyland June 1, 2009. Boyland was attempting to arrest Mosley for parole violation at the parole office on East Fifth Street. Mosley was attempting to leave in a car as Boyland, who was on foot, motioned for Mosley to stop his car, Mosley accelerated toward the officer, police said.

Jim Katcher, assistant Black Hawk County attorney, asked the sentence be stacked consecutive to the second-degree theft and eluding sentences for a total of 35 years in prison.

Mosley's mother, Theresa Mosley, asked District Court Judge George Stigler to consider her son's military service and his struggles with post-traumatic stress disorder.
read more here
Decorated vet gets 15 years for assaulting cop with car

Friday, May 14, 2010

'Surfing makes me feel like I'm flying'



'Surfing makes me feel like I'm flying'
Gulf War veteran Dana Cummings lost a leg in a car crash. He turned to surfing as physical therapy, loving the sense of freedom it gave him. Now he's helping others through the Association of Amputee Surfers, or AmpSurf. FULL STORY

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Why the IOM has found so much PTSD in Gulf War Vets

Why the IOM has found so much PTSD in Gulf War Vets
April 15, 2010 posted by Bob Higgins ·


By Jim Bunker National Gulf War Resource Center

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently concluded that there is sufficient evidence of a causal relationship for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Persian Gulf War (PGW) veterans that would in turn explain their other physical ailments. What a slap in the face. When you look at only a select handful of research studies and discount most others, you can no doubt make a convincing case for PTSD as the primary cause of Gulf War Illnesses (GWI). Veterans from today’s wars as well as the 1991 Persian Gulf War know better. All one needs to do in order to find the truth is to use the internet.

The truth is, for the first 15 years after the PGW the VA focused primarily on PTSD, pushing the belief that that’s what was wrong with us. This is how it’s been for years. When the VA doctors don’t understand something new they write it off as a psychosomatic illness. In other words, they’re telling us that it’s all in our heads. Yes, some of us do have PTSD. Every time men and women have gone to war some have come home with PTSD. Sadly, some even legitimately develop PTSD from having to fight with the VA to gain access to the benefits they earned through their service and sacrifice. These battles between the veteran and the VA continue to this day with not only our PGW veterans, but with our OEF and OIF veterans as well. I just talked to a fellow PGW veteran and he is still having problems with the doctors at the VA in Houston, Texas. Whenever he brings up GWIs, they tell him there is “no such thing”.
read more here
Why the IOM has found so much PTSD in Gulf War Vets

Friday, April 9, 2010

ALS, Lou Gehrig's disease and PTSD found in Gulf War Vets

Review confirms PTSD, other syndromes in Gulf vets
Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor
WASHINGTON

(Reuters) - Studies confirm that Gulf War veterans suffer disproportionately from post-traumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric illnesses as well as vague symptoms often classified as Gulf War Syndrome, a panel of experts reported on Friday.

The Institute of Medicine panel said better studies are needed to characterize a clear pattern of distress and other symptoms among veterans of the conflicts in the Gulf region that started in 1990 and continue today.

"It is clear that a significant portion of the soldiers deployed to the Gulf War have experienced troubling constellations of symptoms that are difficult to categorize," said Stephen Hauser, chairman of the department of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco.

The committee declined to say that there was any such thing as Gulf War Syndrome but did note many veterans had "multisymptom illness."

"Unfortunately, symptoms that cannot be easily quantified are sometimes incorrectly dismissed as insignificant and receive inadequate attention and funding by the medical and scientific establishment," Hauser added in a statement.

"Veterans who continue to suffer from these symptoms deserve the very best that modern science and medicine can offer to speed the development of effective treatments, cures, and -- we hope -- prevention."


The experts, including epidemiologists who study patterns of disease, neurologists and psychiatrists, found limited but suggestive evidence that Gulf War veterans have higher rates of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, also called ALS or Lou Gehrig's disease -- a crippling, progressive and fatal nerve disease.
read more here
Review confirms PTSD, other syndromes in Gulf vets

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Compelling Brain Images Showing Gulf War Illness

Why do any of our veterans have to fight after they did the fighting they were sent to do?

Dr. Haley at UTSW Presents Compelling Brain Images Showing Gulf War Illness
Written by Janet Ralofff
Wednesday, 10 March 2010 07:02
VCS Asks VA: Since UTSW Research Remains Vital to Understanding Gulf War Illness, Then Why Did a Handful of VA Staff in Washington Impede UTSW Contract and Then End Funding for UTSW?

March 9, 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah (Science News) - Nearly two decades after vets began returning from the Middle East complaining of Gulf War Syndrome, the federal government has yet to formally accept that their vague jumble of symptoms constitutes a legitimate illness. Here, at the Society of Toxicology annual meeting, yesterday, researchers rolled out a host of brain images – various types of magnetic-resonance scans and brain-wave measurements – that they say graphically and unambiguously depict Gulf War Syndrome.


Or syndromes. Because Robert Haley of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas and the research team he heads have identified three discrete subtypes. Each is characterized by a different suite of symptoms. And the new imaging linked each illness with a distinct – and different – series of abnormalities in the brain.


read more here
Dr. Haley at UTSW

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

VA Improves Policy on Gulf War Veterans

What is it about veterans that they think they can take on any problem and solve it? What is it about them that they spend time fighting our battles, facing death, watching the backs of their buddies, only to return home and still feel as if they can still keep doing it? It is exactly what veterans like Paul Sullivan do and this nation will be all the more better for it. He served in uniform and then took on battles to fight with brains and facts to use as weapons against harm being done to his "family" of veterans. That is what this kind of battle is. Great harm is being done to the men and women willing to die for the sake of this country. When we fail to tend to their wounds caused by service to America, we fail all who serve.
"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation." - George Washington


This is what I use to close off my emails. Paul understands this and he knows that our obligation to our servicemen and women should never end because they will pay the price for our freedom the rest of their lives. No one leaves combat as a civilian untouched by what was asked of them. It is not just the enemy they have to worry about but what was used and what they were exposed to can often do a lot more damage than the enemy ever could. We saw this with Agent Orange and as of today, they are still linking illnesses associated with it. We also see this with what is happening to our Gulf War veterans still waiting for us to live up to being "a grateful nation."

VCS Advocacy in the News: VA Improves Policy on Gulf War Veterans
Written by Mary Susan Littlepage
Tuesday, 02 March 2010 20:43
VA Agrees to Take Second Look at Thousands of Gulf War Veterans' Disability Claims

March 2, 2010 (TruthOut) - The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has agreed to re-examine the disability claims for what could turn out to be thousands of veterans of the Gulf War.

The development is the result of intense lobbying by veterans' advocacy group Veterans for Common Sense (VCS).

In response to the group's efforts, as many as 210,000 Gulf War veterans suffer from multi-symptom illnesses, and VA Secretary Eric Shineski said in a special interview with The Associated Press that he promises to review Gulf War veterans' disability claims. The claims may cover suffering from ailments that veterans blame on their war service.

Shineski announced that the department's Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses Task Force has nearly completed a comprehensive report that will redefine how the VA addresses the pain and suffering of ill veterans who deployed during the Gulf War in 1990 and 1991.

"At VA, we advocate for veterans - it is our overarching philosophy and, in time, it will become our culture," Shineski said. "Every day we must challenge our assumptions to serve our nation's veterans."

The mission of the VA's Gulf War Task Force is to identify gaps in services as well as opportunities to better serve veterans of the Gulf War. Of the almost 700,000 service members who deployed to Operation Desert Shield in 1990 and Operation Desert Storm in 1991, there have been 300,000 Gulf War veterans with claims decisions, more than 85 percent were granted service connection for at least one condition, and more than 14 percent were not granted service connection for any condition.

"We must learn from the past and take the opportunity to anticipate the future needs of our veterans," Shineski said. "This new approach is the first step in a still unfolding comprehensive plan of how VA will treat and compensate Veterans of the Gulf War era."

Paul Sullivan, spokesperson for VCS, is a Desert Storm veteran who returned home with headaches, skin problems and chronic respiratory infections linked by doctors at the VA with his exposure to depleted uranium radioactive toxic waste while he was deployed to Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia in 1991.
read more here
VA Improves Policy on Gulf War Veterans

Friday, February 26, 2010

VA to assist Gulf War veterans because of Veterans for Common Sense


VCS Advocacy Produces Results

Here is a timeline describing our successful advocacy for Gulf War veterans that resulted in a new decision by VA to assist Gulf War veterans.

On September 24, 2008, VCS wrote VA Secretary James Peake about how VA leaders had improperly denied many Gulf War veterans' disability compensation claims in the early 2000s by failing to tell them about new laws expanding benefits.

In November 2008, VCS led a national effort to publicize the findings of VA's Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans' Illness.


In January 2009, VCS urged Congress to investigate how VA was handling the issue of Gulf War illness.


In May 2009, VCS testified before Congress about the needs and concerns of Gulf War veterans who remain ill due to toxic exposures such as pesticides, oil well fire pollution, experimental pills, experimental anthrax vaccines, depleted uranium, and other poisons.

Yesterday morning, VCS posted our testimony for a hearing about Gulf War veterans originally scheduled for yesterday, but postponed until a date to be determined in the next few months.

Then this morning, a much-needed victory for veterans appeared on the horizon. VA Secretary Eric Shinseki provided an exclusive interview to the Associated Press promising to review Gulf War veterans' disability claims.

The number of potential veterans impacted by VA's decision is at least 15,000, and the number could go higher depending on the scope of VA's review.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

VA leaders promised us reform, and never delivered

Veterans for Common Sense was supposed to be heard but the hearing has been moved to April. After all, the Gulf War veterans, along with all other veterans have waited all this time for congress to really honor them, what's a couple of months more?

Paul Sullivan, Veterans For Common Sense
February 25, 2010 - Veterans for Common Sense thanks Chairman Mitchell, Ranking Member Roe, and members of the Subcommittee for inviting us to testify today.



I am here wearing two hats.



I am here representing Veterans for Common Sense, a non-profit advocacy organization. VCS is here in a spirit of cooperation to offer our seasoned advice for improving VA policies for our nation’s 700,000 Gulf War veterans.



I am also here as a Gulf War veteran who remains ill due to wartime toxic exposures. I have worked on this issue since my return from Desert Storm. Veterans want to know why we are ill, how we can get treatment, and who will pay for our treatment.



Today, VCS presents our written list of 16 detailed policy goals to Congress for specific actions by Congress and the Obama Administration. We ask for our full written statement to be made part of the record.



Our goals are well thought-out and reasonable.



Most of our goals ask VA to do what Congress already ordered VA to do many years ago.



We would also like to thank VA Secretary Eric Shinseki for naming Gulf War veteran and VA Chief of Staff John Gingrich to lead VA’s new Gulf War Task Force.



We look forward to seeing the details of the Task Force report. We have not seen it. At this point, we have more questions than answers.



Mr. Chairman, Gulf War veterans are through with empty gestures from VA for the past 19 years.



Repeatedly during the 1990s, VA leaders promised us reform, and never delivered. In 2002, VA Deputy Secretary Leo MacKay apologized for VA’s shameful treatment of Gulf War veterans and promised reform.



However, behind the scenes, from 1991 through the present, VA bureaucrats scuttled our chances for healthcare and benefits. VCS asks VA to use objective and qualified staff for any new VA effort to assist us.



Let us be clear about today’s expectations: We are willing to work with VA and immediately begin implementing pragmatic solutions.



Here are our nine questions for VA:



1. Will VA Secretary Eric Shinseki publicly confirm that 25 percent of our Gulf War veterans – as many as 175,000 – still suffer from chronic multisymptom illness likely due to toxic exposures? Will the Secretary hold accountable those who blocked or disparaged research, treatment, and benefits?



2. Will VA amend Presidential Review Directive 5? Will our government declare Gulf War illness is a serious public health issue and a long-term cost of war worthy of prompt and high-quality research, treatment, and benefits?



3. Will VA name a specific leader and will VA publicize a timeline for the full implementation of all VA Gulf War Task Force goals?



4. Will Congress fund, and will VA create, a centralized VA office for Gulf War veterans to coordinate implementation of VA policy, training, research, benefits, and outreach?



5. Will Congress fund, and will VA create, a Gulf War advocacy panel?



6. Will Congress act to help VA restore Dr. Robert Haley’s vital research, mandated by Congress, at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center? In a related matter, when will VA investigate the handful of VA employees that VA’s IG concluded had undermined Dr. Haley’s important research? When will VA responded to our FOIA requests about those VA employees?



7. Will Congress urge VA officials to order the use of newer, more sensitive depleted uranium exposure tests as recommended by the Institute of Medicine and sought by Dr. Randall Parrish and by Dr. Haley? Will VA expand the population of veterans participating in DU research sought by Dr. Haley and IOM? If VA does not use the Best Available Current Technology, then VA stands accused of intentionally undermining scientific research and harming veterans.



8. Will VA retrain all VHA medical professionals about the harmful impact of toxic exposures on our veterans? Similarly, will VA retrain all VBA staff about the intent and application of Gulf War benefit laws?



9. Will VBA pay retroactive benefits to the 15,000 Gulf War veterans improperly denied benefits by VBA in 2001 for Fibromyalgia, Chronic Fatigue, and Irritable Bowel Syndrome? VBA leaders may have broken the law by failing to advise veterans about these benefits; the loss of benefits also means the veterans may have been improperly denied essential medical care.



Gulf War veterans should not have to continue waiting for VA to act. We are tired of what we call “death by bureaucracy,” where we wait endlessly for research, treatment, and benefits.



After nearly 20 years of delays and denials, today represents a rare opportunity for VA leaders to implement a set of reasonable, progressive, and pragmatic policies that address our needs for research, treatment, and benefits. Our veterans are dying, the time for delays is over, and the time for action is now.



America’s veterans are watching this hearing. They want Congress to press VA leaders to help Gulf War veterans and quickly address two more new emerging public health concerns: Iraq’s toxic burn pits and Camp Lejeune’s poisoned water.



We strongly urge Congress to demand action from VA to address our concerns today. We also thank Chairman Filner for his outstanding leadership and advocacy since 1993.



Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Friday, October 16, 2009

Judge backs VA in Desert Storm vet’s suit

Judge backs VA in Desert Storm vet’s suit

By Ed White - The Associated Press
Posted : Thursday Oct 15, 2009 20:57:04 EDT

DETROIT — The family of an Army veteran who claims the government failed to diagnose an illness that spread to his wife and two children lost the case Thursday at a federal appeals court, ending five years of litigation.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said there is insufficient evidence that doctors at the Department of Veterans Affairs should have known that Arvid Brown Jr. had symptoms of the parasitic disease leishmaniasis after serving in Saudi Arabia in 1991.

Because of that, the three-judge panel said, the VA cannot be held liable for failing to warn that the disease might spread to Brown’s family. Its decision affirmed a 2008 ruling by a federal judge in Detroit.

The court “just continues the pervasive and ongoing effort of the Department of Veterans Affairs to ignore those who have been injured in the first Gulf War,” said the family’s attorney, Robert Walsh.
read more here
Judge backs VA in Desert Storm vets suit

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Cancels Contract with UTSW Medical Center

UPDATE
A New False outrage

As usual spin is in and truth is out, even when it comes to our veterans. This program was not working according to the agreement the VA had with them. This is from a "news" site. Notice the wording.

Democrats cancel Gulf War illness research money
that Republicans earmarked for Texas center

Suzanne Gamboa August 26th, 2009


Too bad this "news" site missed this

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 31, 2009
11:49 AM
CONTACT: Congressman Dennis Kucinich
Nathan White (202)225-5871


Kucinich Secures $8 Million For Gulf War Veterans Illness Research
Money Will Expand On Studies For Treatment, Bringing Us Closer To Identifying A Cure
WASHINGTON - July 31 -

Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) secured a major victory for veterans of the first Gulf War by garnering $8 million for Gulf War Illness (GWI) research in the Fiscal Year 2010 Appropriations bill that passed the House yesterday.


“This research will build on previous studies on Gulf War Illness.” Kucinich said. “This funding will take giant steps forward in identifying a treatment or a cure for Gulf War Veteran’s illness.”


In its landmark 454-page report delivered in November, the Congressionally-mandated Research Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans Illnesses at the Department of Veterans Affairs (RAC) reported that “Gulf War illness is real, that it is the result of neurotoxin exposures during Gulf War deployment and that few veterans have recovered or substantially improved with time.”


For the first time, the report identified several suspected causes and two known causes: exposure to pesticides and a drug given to troops to protect them from nerve gas.


“There are currently no effective treatments for these conditions. With research, we learn the true causes of GWI and the possibilities open up. We must continue to attack GWI and fund the research with an amount commensurate with the scope of the problem,” said Kucinich.


Kucinich’s request for funding received bipartisan support from Reps. Henry Brown, Holt, Filner, Michaud, Baldwin, C. Brown, Conyers, Edwards, Grijalva, Hall, Maloney, McDermott, D. Moore, G. Moore, Pascrell, Pingree, Ross, Sestak, Stark and Yarmuth.

http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/07/31-4






And this one

Gulf War Research Funding Positive Sign for Affected Veterans
Submitted by linda on Wed, 12/06/2006 - 12:00am.
Wednesday, December 6, 2006
WASHINGTON - The leader of the nation’s largest veterans organization applauds Congress for having the foresight to provide funding to the Southwestern Medical Center’s Gulf War Illness research program. The Center, headed by Dr. Robert Haley at the University of Texas Southwestern, was awarded $15 million, renewable for up to four years, to further the scientific knowledge on Gulf War Veterans Illnesses research. “This research will not only impact veterans of the 1991 Gulf War, but may prove beneficial for those currently serving in the Southwest Asia theater and the Middle East during this Global War on Terror,” said National Commander Paul A. Morin. According to the quarterly Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom health care utilization report released last month issued by the Veteran Health Administration's Office of Public Health and Environmental Hazards, there have been 67,743 visits made for illnesses categorized as “Symptoms, Signs and Ill Defined Conditions” out of the 205,097 visits made to VA Medical Centers. The Institute of Medicine’s September 2006 report, Gulf War and Health, Volume 4, indicated that existing research has demonstrated that Gulf War veterans are reporting more symptoms including more severe symptoms than their non-deployed counter-parts and there is no known explanation for it. “The purpose of research is to fill in the gaps of knowledge where there is little, yet suggestive information,” Morin explained. “Dr. Haley’s research will further this knowledge about Gulf War veterans’ illnesses and hopefully help improve the lives of ill Gulf War veterans, and their families who suffer beside them,” Morin added.

Gulf War Research Funding Positive Sign for Affected Veterans


There were rules this funding involved and if this "news" site read the report they posted, they would know why the funding was cut off. I thought people were supposed to care about our veterans and where the money was goind while they wait for help.

VA Continues Gulf War Research,

Cancels Contract with UTSW Medical Center



WASHINGTON (Aug. 26, 2009) - Citing persistent noncompliance and
numerous performance deficiencies, the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) will not exercise the third year of a five-year, $75 million
contract with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
(UTSWMC) to perform research into Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses (GWVI).



"Research into the illnesses suffered by Gulf War Veterans remains a
priority for VA," said Dr. Gerald M. Cross, VA's Acting Under Secretary
for Health. "As part of our commitment to this vital effort, we must
make certain that our resources are used to support effective and
productive research."



VA listed several reasons for not exercising the contract option,
including UTSWMC's persistent and continuing noncompliance with contract
terms and conditions and detailed documentation by the contracting
officer of performance deficiencies. VA also noted that its Office of
Inspector General documented severe performance deficiencies in a July
15 report and recommended that no further task orders be issued under
the contract.




VA will meet with UTSWMC contract staff on today to provide guidance for
completing work in progress and submitting adequate documentation to
allow payment. UTSWMC will be allowed to fulfill task orders already in
progress if it corrects all performance deficiencies. .



The decision not to continue the contract means VA's research program
will be able to redirect funds to support additional research into GWVI.
In 2010, that research will include a genomic study to identify
susceptibility factors and markers of GWVI; studies of similarities and
differences with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia; studies of
new diagnostic tests; identification of sub-populations of ill Gulf War
Veterans; and studies of potential new treatments.



The redirected funding for these new VA research initiatives will be in
addition to the substantial support VA already provides for GWVI
research--$7 million in 2008 and $4.8 million so far in 2009.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

1,200 veterans wrongly told they got fatal disease

1,200 veterans wrongly told they got fatal disease
By P.J. DICKERSCHEID (AP)

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Former Air Force Reservist Gale Reid received a letter from the Veterans Affairs Department that told her she had Lou Gehrig's disease, and she immediately put herself through a battery of painful, expensive tests. Five days later, the VA said its "diagnosis" was a mistake.

The Montgomery, Ala., resident was among at least 1,200 veterans who received a letter about disability benefits for ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease, even though they hadn't been diagnosed with the illness, according to the National Gulf War Resource Center. Veterans were initially suspicious of the letters, but still went through the agony not knowing exactly whether they had the fatal disease, which typically kills people within five years.

At least 2,500 letters informing veterans of disability benefits for ALS were sent out, and of those, some 1,200 were a mistake, according to the National Gulf War Resource Center. The wrongly sent letters were supposed to inform veterans of an undiagnosed neurological disorder, according to the Gulf War veterans group, which provides information, support and referrals about illnesses to veterans.

No one knows for sure exactly how many letters were mailed to veterans treated at VA hospitals and how many were a mistake. VA spokeswoman Katie Roberts didn't return telephone messages or an e-mail Monday.

Former Army Sgt. Samuel Hargrove cried Sunday after opening his letter.

"I can't even describe the intensity of my feelings," said the father of two from Henderson, N.C. "With so many health issues that I already have, I didn't know how to approach my family with the news."

So, at first, he didn't. Hargrove later discovered the mistake after talking with fellow veterans in the resource center and online, and he became angry.
read more here
1200 veterans wrongly told they got fatal disease

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

House Allows Gulf War POWs to Sue Iraq Over Torture


This is how it started




RETURNED PRISONERS OF WAR
FROM GULF WAR I --1991


NAME SERVICE DATE OF CAPTURE CARRIED AS RELEASE DATE
Acree, Clifford M. USMC Jan.18, 1991 POW 03/05/91
Andrews, William USAF -- MIA 03/05/91
Berryman, Michael C. USMC -- MIA 03/05/91
Cornum, Rhonda USA -- * 03/05/91
Dunlap, Troy USA -- * 03/05/91
Eberly, David W. USAF Jan. 17, 1991 POW 03/05/91
Fox, Jeffrey USAF Feb. 19, 1991 POW 03/05/91
Griffith, Thomas E. Jr. USAF Jan. 17, 1991 POW 03/04/91
Hunter, Guy L. Jr. USMC Jan. 18, 1991 POW 03/05/91
Lockett, David USA Jan. 20, 1991 MIA 03/04/91
Roberts, Harry M. USAF Jan. - 1991 POW 03/05/91
Rathbun-Nealy, Melissa USA Jan. 30, 1991 MIA 03/04/91
Slade, Lawrence R. USN Jan. 21, 19915,3 POW 03/04/91
Small, Joseph USMC Feb. 25, 1991 MIA 03/05/91
Sanborn, Russell A.C. USMC Feb. 09, 1991 MIA 03/05/91
Stamaris, Daniel USA -- * 03/05/91
Storr, Richard Dale USAF -- MIA 03/05/91
Sweet, Robert J. USAF Feb. - , 1991 MIA 03/05/91
Tice, Jeffrey Scott USAF Jan. -, 1991 POW 03/05/91
Wetzel, Robert USN Jan. 17, 1991 MIA 03/04/91
Zaun, Jeffrey Norton USN Jan. 17, 1991 POW 03/04/91


http://www.nationalalliance.org/gulf/returnees.htm




Archive for Tuesday, February 15, 2005
White House Turns Tables on Former American POWs
By David G. Savage
February 15, 2005 in print edition A-1

The latest chapter in the legal history of torture is being written by American pilots who were beaten and abused by Iraqis during the 1991 Persian Gulf War. And it has taken a strange twist.

The Bush administration is fighting the former prisoners of war in court, trying to prevent them from collecting nearly $1 billion from Iraq that a federal judge awarded them as compensation for their torture at the hands of Saddam Hussein’s regime.

The rationale: Today’s Iraqis are good guys, and they need the money.

The case abounds with ironies. It pits the U.S. government squarely against its own war heroes and the Geneva Convention.

Many of the pilots were tortured in the same Iraqi prison, Abu Ghraib, where American soldiers abused Iraqis 15 months ago. Those Iraqi victims, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said, deserve compensation from the United States.

But the American victims of Iraqi torturers are not entitled to similar payments from Iraq, the U.S. government says.

“It seems so strange to have our own country fighting us on this,” said retired Air Force Col. David W. Eberly, the senior officer among the former POWs.

The case, now being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, tests whether “state sponsors of terrorism” can be sued in the U.S. courts for torture, murder or hostage-taking. The court is expected to decide in the next two months whether to hear the appeal.

Congress opened the door to such claims in 1996, when it lifted the shield of sovereign immunity – which basically prohibits lawsuits against foreign governments – for any nation that supports terrorism. At that time, Iraq was one of seven nations identified by the State Department as sponsoring terrorist activity. The 17 Gulf War POWs looked to have a very strong case when they first filed suit in 2002. They had been undeniably tortured by a tyrannical regime, one that had $1.7 billion of its assets frozen by the U.S. government.

The picture changed, however, when the United States invaded Iraq and toppled Hussein from power nearly two years ago. On July 21, 2003, two weeks after the Gulf War POWs won their court case in U.S. District Court, the Bush administration intervened to argue that their claims should be dismissed.

“No amount of money can truly compensate these brave men and women for the suffering that they went through at the hands of this very brutal regime and at the hands of Saddam Hussein,” White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan told reporters when asked about the case in November 2003.

Government lawyers have insisted, literally, on “no amount of money” going to the Gulf War POWs. “These resources are required for the urgent national security needs of rebuilding Iraq,” McClellan said.

The case also tests a key provision of the Geneva Convention, the international law that governs the treatment of prisoners of war. The United States and other signers pledged never to “absolve” a state of “any liability” for the torture of POWs.

Former military lawyers and a bipartisan group of lawmakers have been among those who have urged the Supreme Court to take up the case and to strengthen the law against torturers and tyrannical regimes.

“Our government is on the wrong side of this issue,” said Jeffrey F. Addicott, a former Army lawyer and director of the Center for Terrorism Law at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. “A lot of Americans would scratch their heads and ask why is our government taking the side of Iraq against our POWs.”

The POWs’ journey through the court system began with the events of Jan. 17, 1991 – the first day of the Gulf War. In response to Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait five months earlier, the United States, as head of a United Nations coalition, launched an air attack on Iraq, determined to drive Iraqi forces from the oil-rich Gulf state. On the first day of the fighting, a jet piloted by Marine Corps Lt. Col. Clifford Acree was downed over Iraq by a surface-to-air missile. He suffered a neck injury ejecting from the plane and was soon taken prisoner by the Iraqis.

Blindfolded and handcuffed, he was beaten until he lost consciousness. His nose was broken, his skull was fractured, and he was threatened with having his fingers cut off. He lost 30 pounds during his 47 days of captivity.

Eberly was shot down two days later and lost 45 pounds during his ordeal. He and several other U.S. service members were near starvation when they were freed. Other POWs had their eardrums ruptured and were urinated on during their captivity at Abu Ghraib.

All the while, their families thought they were dead because the Iraqis did not notify the U.S. government of their capture.

In April 2002, the Washington law firm of Steptoe & Johnson filed suit on behalf of the 17 former POWs and 37 of their family members. The suit, Acree vs. Republic of Iraq, sought monetary damages for the “acts of torture committed against them and for pain, suffering and severe mental distress of their families.”

Usually, foreign states have a sovereign immunity that shields them from being sued. But in the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996, Congress authorized U.S. courts to award “money damages

This provision was “designed to hold terrorist nations accountable for the torture of Americans and to deter rogue nations from engaging in such actions in the future,” Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and George Allen (R-Va.) said last year in a letter to Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft that urged him to support the POWs’ claim.

The case came before U.S. District Judge Richard W. Roberts. There was no trial; Hussein’s regime ignored the suit, and the U.S. State Department chose to take no part in the case.

On July 7, 2003, the judge handed down a long opinion that described the abuse suffered by the Gulf War POWs, and he awarded them $653 million in compensatory damages. He also assessed $306 million in punitive damages against Iraq. Lawyers for the POWs asked him to put a hold on some of Iraq’s frozen assets.

No sooner had the POWs celebrated their victory than they came up against a new roadblock: Bush administration lawyers argued that the case should be thrown out of court on the grounds that Bush had voided any such claims against Iraq, which was now under U.S. occupation. The administration lawyers based their argument on language in an emergency bill, passed shortly after the U.S. invasion of Iraq, approving the expenditure of $80 billion for military operations and reconstruction efforts. One clause in the legislation authorized the president to suspend the sanctions against Iraq that had been imposed as punishment for the invasion of Kuwait more than a decade earlier.

The president’s lawyers said this clause also allowed Bush to remove Iraq from the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terrorism and to set aside pending monetary judgments against Iraq.

When the POWs’ case went before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit,, the three-judge panel ruled unanimously for the Bush administration and threw out the lawsuit.

“The United States possesses weighty foreign policy interests that are clearly threatened by the entry of judgment for [the POWs] in this case,” the appeals court said.

The administration also succeeding in killing a congressional resolution supporting the POWs’ suit. “U.S. courts no longer have jurisdiction to hear cases such as those filed by the Gulf War POWs,” then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard L. Armitage said in a letter to lawmakers. “Moreover, the president has ordered the vesting of blocked Iraqi assets for use by the Iraqi people and for reconstruction.”

Already frustrated by the turn of events, the former POWs were startled when Rumsfeld said he favored awarding compensation to the Iraqi prisoners who were abused by the U.S. military at Abu Ghraib.

“I am seeking a way to provide appropriate compensation to those detainees who suffered grievous and brutal abuse and cruelty at the hands of a few members of the U.S. military. It is the right thing to do,” Rumsfeld told a Senate committee last year.

By contrast, the government’s lawyers have refused to even discuss a settlement in the POWs’ case, say lawyers for the Gulf War veterans. “They were willing to settle this for pennies on the dollar,” said Addicott, the former Army lawyer.

The last hope for the POWs rests with the Supreme Court. Their lawyers petitioned the high court last month to hear the case. Significantly, it has been renamed Acree vs. Iraq and the United States.

The POWs say the justices should decide the “important and recurring question [of] whether U.S. citizens who are victims of state-sponsored terrorism [may] seek redress against terrorist states in federal court.”

This week, Justice Department lawyers are expected to file a brief urging the court to turn away the appeal.
http://articles.latimes.com/2005/feb/15/nation/na-pow15


This is what happened today


House Allows Gulf War POWs to Sue Iraq Over Torture
Tuesday, September 16, 2008



WASHINGTON — Former POWs and civilians who were tortured or held hostage during the 1991 Gulf War could pursue lawsuits against Iraq under legislation the House has approved.

The White House, saying the bill would threaten economic and political progress in Iraq, threatened to veto the measure if it reaches the president's desk. It still has to clear the Senate.

The legislation, passed by voice vote late Monday, could affect some 17 prisoners of war — all but one pilots of aircraft downed over Iraq or Kuwait — and more than 200 American civilians working in Iraq and Kuwait and held as "human shields" after then-President Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait.

The legislation, sponsored by Rep. Bruce Braley, D-Iowa, would take away the president's authority to exempt Iraq from lawsuits brought by Americans tortured by state sponsors of terrorism. The president could still grant immunity if he certifies that Iraq has adequately settled, or is making good-faith efforts to settle, claims against it from pending court cases.

A House Republican, Rep. Darrell Issa of California, was behind the compromise language in the new bill, but the White House said the certification provisions were inadequate to allow the president's waiver rights to continue.
go here for more
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,423241,00.html


You would think that if Bush and the rest of the GOP had really cared about the troops, especially the veterans and especially these veterans of the Gulf War, they would have allowed the suit to go ahead years ago. But then you would also have to think that in this country, this country especially, no veteran would ever have to fight for the justice, service, care and treatment they earned by being willing to serve this nation.

Monday, August 4, 2008

Minnesota National Guard combatants and goodwill ambassadors

Troops struggle in Iraq; families struggle at home

Second of a seven-part series By Sharon Cohen
Associated Press
Editor's note: National Guard troops reach their stations in Iraq while family members back home begin a hard adjustment.

The phone call surprised Katie Kriesel, so soon after her husband, John, shipped out.

"Where are you?" she asked.

"I am where I need to be," he answered cryptically, not wanting to disclose his exact location in Iraq. He probably would have waited to call home to Minnesota, but April 8, 2006, was special - it was Katie's 26th birthday.

Kriesel was at Camp Fallujah, just east of the city where U.S. contractors had been hanged from a bridge, where Marines had battled insurgents in some of the bloodiest battles of the war.

Soon after his arrival, Kriesel saw a tent near his living quarters that had been hit by enemy mortar fire, twisting the metal support beams and shredding the canvas.

Welcome to Iraq.

But Kriesel wanted to be in the thick of the action, not sitting in a tower or standing guard in a mess hall. He'd always been gung-ho; even as a kid he had watched the Gulf War on TV and proclaimed: "If I can get paid to do that, then I'm in."

Kriesel had trouble sleeping his first night in Iraq. His gear hadn't arrived, the air conditioning in his tent was going full blast and he had no blankets.

Some guys, he noticed, were sleeping in their body armor. He used his as a pillow. If a mortar lands here, he thought, it won't matter if I'm wearing chain mail. I'm a goner.

As he settled into the soldier's life, Katie established a routine in Minnesota.

She dropped off their sons, Elijah, almost 5, and Broden, 3, at day care in the morning, headed to work at a freight-forwarding company, then picked up the boys. Every evening it was dinner, baths, then time to check the computer for messages from Dad or await his call. Some days there was special mail - "Operation Iraqi Freedom" T-shirts or coins that Elijah brought to show-and-tell.

But reminders of those at war came home in less comforting ways, too. One day, Elijah, waiting in a gym for Katie, saw a TV news story about a soldier who died in Iraq.

"Is Dad going to die?" he asked his mother.

No, she assured him - that's why the family prayed every night to keep Dad safe.

By spring 2006, however, the war was entering its fourth year, more than 2,000 U.S. troops were dead, and it was clear no place in Iraq was secure.

No road seemed off-limits to improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, no building impervious to attacks. Not the fortressed Green Zone, not the United Nations headquarters, not the forward operating bases where thousands of soldiers made a ready target.

The 1st Brigade Combat Team/34th Infantry Division - not just Minnesotans, but incorporating soldiers from 36 states - was headquartered at Tallil Air Base in southern Iraq near Nasiriyah. But the thousands of troops were stationed throughout the central and southern parts of the country.

They were both combatants and goodwill ambassadors, fighting insurgents with rocket launchers and handing out Beanie Babies to Iraqi kids. They escorted fuel and food convoys, conducted patrols, provided security, tended to the sick and wounded, delivered books and supplies to schools, paved roads, helped start newspapers and built and repaired water treatment plants.

They worked together in close quarters, and inevitably, became surrogate family.
go here for more
http://www.leadertelegram.com/story-news.asp?id=BHCO6P5SELC